criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
Blog Article
five. Uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General in addition to counsel for your complainant further argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led towards the recovery of sleeping products on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore continues to be created before the Court wherein the sleeping supplements were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected while in the liver but not in the belly. Therefore, the recovery of reported sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General and also counsel for that complainant have also argued that during the investigation of the case the petitioner Bhoora led to the recovery of a motorcycle.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, it is also a perfectly-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and contain all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal information or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed towards the court in which the case has actually been or will be filed.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. Should the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then technique the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the ninety days for the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision of your Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
The presiding judge emphasised the need to address the evolving techniques employed by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological aspects allows for the more detailed legal reaction.
Any court might look for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, together with eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature with the seized currency.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent along with the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case law by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This may possibly transpire several times as the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first from the High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his improvement on the concept of estoppel starting from the High Trees case.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
10. Without touching the merits of the case of the issue of once-a-year increases from the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, these yearly increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, calls for further assessment to get made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is nicely established now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service composition but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority might if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his very own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that these types of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of fork out and allowances of this sort of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and potential hazard to local residents. Finally, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, when observing the general craze supports that electromagnetic fields have negative effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out while in the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Enhancement, the first international instrument that linked environment british case law protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason to prevent environmental degradation.